Your message dated Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:04:33 +0200 with message-id <200704041604.33788.elendil@planet.nl> and subject line Bug#376158: Should document apt's new pdiff feature has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Should document apt's new pdiff feature
- From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 17:31:10 +0200
- Message-id: <200606301731.19440.elendil@planet.nl>
Package: release-notes Severity: wishlist The release notes for Etch should probably mention the new pdiff feature in apt, including the way to turn it off: Acquire::Pdiffs { "false"; }; Some people have noted that on a fast connection and infrequent apt updates, using the pdiffs may actually be slower than getting the whole Packages file.Attachment: pgpFWYPTq1U4F.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 376158-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#376158: Should document apt's new pdiff feature
- From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
- Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:04:33 +0200
- Message-id: <200704041604.33788.elendil@planet.nl>
Text has been modified to address the later comments.
--- End Message ---