Re: Update to w.d.o/cvs
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> Attached is a proposed updated to the webpage in the DDP project that
> describes how CVS access needs to be obtained. Since Martin Schulze has
> been taking care of this lately I believe the document is no longer
> up-to-date and should be updated based on the information available at
No objection, but it may be useful to link to that page as well.
> Index: cvs.wml
> RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/doc/cvs.wml,v
> retrieving revision 1.20
> diff -u -r1.20 cvs.wml
> --- cvs.wml 4 Dec 2004 12:40:27 -0000 1.20
> +++ cvs.wml 15 Mar 2005 23:34:25 -0000
> @@ -152,12 +152,47 @@
> writing the manuals. We generally request that you have submitted
> a couple of useful patches first.
> -<p>To obtain update privileges, send a request to the <a
> -href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">Documentation Coordinator</a>, GPG
> -encrypted with the Debian public key for <code>email@example.com</code>.
> -In this email, include the username you want to use on the pserver, an
> -alternative username in case your first wish is not available, and
> -supplying a password (cleartext or crypted is fine).
> +<p>To obtain update privileges, you need to send a request to the <a
> +href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">Documentation Coordinator</a> and to
> +the <a href="mailto:email@example.com">Debian documentation
> +mailing list</a> adding
> +<a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">debian-admin</a>
> +in the <tt>CC:</tt>. Please explain why you need access.
> +Either the Documentation Coordinator or a relevant
> +member of the Debian Documentation Team needs to approve your request
> +before you are granted access.
I'm not sure if aph is managing this at all, so it may be useful to
skip him and just request to mail -doc. I also don't think that a
cc of the full thread to -admin is of any use. It's better to contact
-admin with the outcome of the discussion. When we get flooded by
mails we can't handle it's a good chance to kill the entire thread
and hence miss the outcome.
There are lies, statistics and benchmarks.