Re: RFC: Changing of /doc/manuals/ implementation
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:34:50PM +0100, Rob Bradford wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 01:38, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 09:45:17PM +0100, Rob Bradford wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2002-09-09 at 16:12, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > > Rob Bradford wrote:
> > > > > I'm proposing a new hierarchy for the /doc/manuals/ tree.
> > ...
> > By the way, what inconsistencies are you talking. Missing link to the
> > "examples". Or missing HTML (this must be).
I should have said "which inconsistencies ..."
> The fact there are directories for en, fr, it and es in /doc/manuals/
> that contain files generated by reference and quick-reference even
> though there are quick-reference and reference directories in
That one. I see.
> Surely you can see that is inconsistent. Its not particularly easy to
> describe :(
You made it clear :)
It arises from the fact that all HTML need to be in a same directories
while other formats required to stay in directories of locales to keep
them without having awkward double extentions.
As long as everyone agrees to use double extentions, I am happy to
follow. Just tell me which to use with reasons, pt_BR or pt-br :-)
Oh, once we agree, we should update docpolicy page accordingly.
> Founder: http://www.debianplanet.org/
> Developer: http://www.debian.org/
> Monkey with keyboard: http://www.robster.org.uk/
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +++++
Osamu Aoki @ Cupertino CA USA, GPG-key: A8061F32
.''`. Debian Reference: post-installation user's guide for non-developers
: :' : http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ also http://qref.sf.net
`. `' "Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software" --- Social Contract