On Jul 14, David Kalnischkies <kalnischkies@gmail.com> wrote: > At least I am seriously expecting that Debian isn't discarding the outcome > of a project it has officially endorsed to be under its umbrella for GSoC > without even the slightest bit of consideration. I am seriously expecting that Debian will not waste time with what is clearly an inferior solution just because somebody approved a GSoC project for it. > GSoC in Debian was announced a long time ago, enough time to raise > any objections against any proposed project. Either this wasn't done or > it wasn't done loud enough as the OpenRC project was accepted and is now It was done by me and others in the related BTS bug (#684396), and I believe that I was loud enough. > being worked on by a student, so its too late to voice any concerns now > as this is just slapping the student right across the face. Its at least I am quite sure that the quality of Debian and its continued viability as a modern OS is way more important than anybody's feelings. > Feel free to evaluate (any project) after it is finished and draw your > conclusions from that (for the specific project, GSoC in general, …), > but don't complaining about it without even trying. There is no reason to wait, since the GSoC project cannot solve the fundamental issues about GSoC. > Last I heard, that was exactly systemd fanbase complain: that everyone > just complained without even trying it based on hearsay. I am not a systemd fan, I am a modern init fan. We have at least two of these around: systemd and upstart. OpenRC does not qualify. -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature