Re: lib*-java, D packaging
Bernhard R. Link:
> * Michael Stapelberg <firstname.lastname@example.org> [130102 09:13]:
> > Given that we already have python-* and ruby-*, I’d find golang-* more
> > consistent.
> We also have lib*-perl.
and lib*-java, but the java packaging might not be the best place to look for
best practices? (Since we're few people.)
I'm also following this thread to look for ideas for the D language which has
similar packaging characteristics like go as it seems.
Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro