Re: the right bug severity in case of data corruption
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I demand that Vincent Lefevre may or may not have written...
> On 2012-11-28 11:47:38 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
>> Let's give it a test, this mail should be signed:
>> From blahhityblah Fri Jul 8 12:08:34 2011
>>>From foobarbaz Fri Jul 8 12:08:34 2011
>>>>From quux Fri Jul 8 12:08:34 2011
>> If the signature is invalid, your setup is broken.
> Even users of mboxo shouldn't even have a problem because in your
> message the F of the "From " line is encoded in quoted-printable:
> | =46rom blahhityblah Fri Jul 8 12:08:34 2011
> | >From foobarbaz Fri Jul 8 12:08:34 2011
> | >>From quux Fri Jul 8 12:08:34 2011
>
> So, there's no possible corruption due to the mailbox format.
Let's see if this can be done properly... if this fails, I'll use raw SMTP.
Of course, this is subject to MXes and list servers not modifying the
content...!
- From blahhityblah Fri Jul 8 12:08:34 2011
>From foobarbaz Fri Jul 8 12:08:34 2011
>>From quux Fri Jul 8 12:08:34 2011
- --
| _ | Darren Salt, using Debian GNU/Linux (and Android)
| ( ) |
| X | ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML e-mail
| / \ | http://www.asciiribbon.org/
I'd like to, but my favourite advert is on TV.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFQtimhzbwfTn7RbcARAsLsAKCqjIOvgqHc+q12po8wtOMkY9HKhgCfQDpt
D56zQdIVsEAzF+4xb8TW82I=
=Zn6Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: