Re: Really, about udev, not init sytsems

[John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>]

On Nov 28, 2012, at 12:04 PM, Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> wrote:

>> However, it's the opinion of the systemd
>> primary upstream authors that having /usr on a separate fs is a bad idea
>> since there are tools that (primarily) some udev rules use, which live
>> on /usr.
> Yeah, we all so his marvelous examples of software that
> would break. His first example is pulseaudio, which is one
> of the software he authors. Brilliant way of thinking, if you
> ask me. Like: one of my software is broken, therefor, I will
> do more breakage...

Please do not just cut out the information which is relevant to get your point across. Picking only Pulse-Audio out of the many things he mentioned - most of them not written by him - to prove that he takes also the full blame for that situation is also a form of lying.

If did a proper and fair argumentation, you'd have to admit that he is right and it's not just about the things he wrote.

Adrian