Re: Really, about udev, not init sytsems
On 11/28/2012 02:38 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> There is nothing in systemd's or udev's architecture that requires
> having /usr mounted early.
That's not truth anymore, since AFAIK rules of udev moved to /usr.
> However, it's the opinion of the systemd
> primary upstream authors that having /usr on a separate fs is a bad idea
> since there are tools that (primarily) some udev rules use, which live
> on /usr.
Yeah, we all so his marvelous examples of software that
would break. His first example is pulseaudio, which is one
of the software he authors. Brilliant way of thinking, if you
ask me. Like: one of my software is broken, therefor, I will
do more breakage...
Thomas
Reply to:
- References:
- Gentoo guys starting a fork of udev
- From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Re: Really, about udev, not init sytsems (was: Gentoo guys starting a fork of udev)
- From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Re: Really, about udev, not init sytsems (was: Gentoo guys starting a fork of udev)
- From: Toni Mueller <toni@debian.org>
- Re: Really, about udev, not init sytsems (was: Gentoo guys starting a fork of udev)
- From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
- Re: Really, about udev, not init sytsems
- From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Re: Really, about udev, not init sytsems
- From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
- Re: Really, about udev, not init sytsems
- From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Re: Really, about udev, not init sytsems
- From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
- Re: Really, about udev, not init sytsems
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Really, about udev, not init sytsems
- From: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no>