On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 01:46:41PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote: > What do you think? Does this sound like a fair compromise everyone > could live with? Voting is almost never a way to reach consensus. Rather, it acknowledges that consensus has not been reached and side-steps further constructive attempts to reach it. I'm positive we can have consensus on this issue. In fact, I think we're pretty close to it. I'm traveling, so can't elaborate in more detail on this matter. But I urge you to reconsider proposing a GR. It is a heavy weight tool, that should be used as a last resort. I don't think we're nowhere near the need of it in this specific case. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . zack@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Debian Project Leader . . . . . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature