Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> writes: > > > Adam Borowski wrote: > >> Could you please mention which ones do not? And if so, how are they > >> relevant/are they fixable? > > > > As one of the maintainers of debootstrap, I am perhaps more aware than > > some how broadly it's used. Ok.. > > > > They use it on Android (41,600 hits including http://evilzone.org/android/debian-on-android/) > > They use it on Nokia (96,600 hits) > > They use it on Nook (14,000 hits) > > They use it on headless old Red Hat systems in a datacenter somewhere > > They use it on Debian oldstable systems, where xz-utils is not even packaged. > > They use it on absolutely modern peices of unusual kit that ship with some > > crufty busybox binary (no source naturally) from far up the supplier > > chain, that was built well before xz support entered busybox in 2010. > > How are they relevant? Where do they download and unpack udebs? Where is > busybox used to unpack debs? In the above message "it" is debootstrap. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature