On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 12:53:37AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > <disclaimer>I know almost nothing about systemd</disclaimer> > > I'd like people to think twice before opt-in for systemd. I just > taked with a friend working for redhat, and he told me how much > he hates it. He told me that if *anything* goes wrong in the boot > process, then basically, you're stuck, because the next thing will > be waiting forever. That's basically truth with any event based > init, and maybe we're just fine with just dependency booting. Oh nice! I managed a to spark a new empty discussion, which repeats the old arguments, but produces no code. And now there's a challenge to start a new round of naked FUD wrestling. This was quite the opposite of what I tried to do. Sorry. Bugs happen. They get fixed. Life goes on. If you don't grok that, you should disqualify yourself from doing anything with technology. I am disappointed in myself for believing that anything good would come from discussing anything controversial on debian-devel. Luckily, this new realisation has sobered me so thoroghly that if I get drunk on Irish whiskey tonight, I won't have a hungover tomorrow. -- All my predictions will turn out to be false
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature