Re: history transparency

To: Debian Devel <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: history transparency
From: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:36:04 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 4F33A194.1070909@progress-technologies.net>
Reply-to: Debian Devel <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4F339079.3060505@philipashmore.com>
References: <[🔎] 4F3387B6.10509@philipashmore.com> <[🔎] 09830c12ff300691e77eb43968a1c223@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org> <[🔎] 4F339079.3060505@philipashmore.com>

On 02/09/2012 10:23 AM, Philip Ashmore wrote:
> I guess the next thing to roll out in the future will be virtual
> machines representing Debians target architectures running acceptance
> tests on the snapshots before publication.

images can be built by pointing to specific urls of snapshot.d.o used as
mirror sources for live-build.

-- 
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:          daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net
Internet:       http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/

Reply to:

References:
- history transparency
  - From: Philip Ashmore <contact@philipashmore.com>
- Re: history transparency
  - From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Re: history transparency
  - From: Philip Ashmore <contact@philipashmore.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Description-less Packages indices
Next by Date: Re: Please test gzip -9n - related to dpkg with multiarch support
Previous by thread: Re: history transparency
Next by thread: MIA check for Robert Jordens and Mark A. Hershberger (anyone in contact with them?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread