[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Please add a sponsorship-requests pseudo-package



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

Hello,

as we seem to have reached general consensus about the approach to
handle sponsor requests in the BTS. The last thing subject to discussion
is the name of the pseudo-package to agree upon.

Zack made a good suggestion to me, which I proposed to people interested
in this discussion, and we all seemed to agree that
"sponsorship-requests" is a good name for the pseudo-package, letting
alone the mentors.debian.net -> .org discussion entirely.

For the record: The related thread started in [1] and in a IRC
discussion with don we (ansgar, gregoa, jwilk, bremner, paultag, myself)
seemed to agree to this name proposal.

Hence, please add a "sponsorship-requests" pseudo-package with
debian-mentors@lists.debian.org as a package owner and we can get started.


[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/01/msg00365.html
- -- 
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=UqNj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: