Re: status of DEP5: Machine-readable debian/copyright (was: Patch Tagging Guidelines: DEP-3 moved to ACCEPTED status)
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Thomas Goirand <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 01/17/2012 01:44 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:14:26PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>>> FTR given that I got no reports of problems with DEP-3, that it's already
>>> well established, I just changed the state of the DEP-3 from CANDIDATE
>>> to ACCEPTED.
>>> Of course this does not mean that the DEP-3 can't be extended or improved
>>> (in particular when it doesn't break backwards compatibility)
>>> but it does mean that this format is ready for widespread usage. Use it to
>>> document the patches that you add to Debian packages:
>> +1 for moving this to accepted.
> Steve, since you're marked as "|Drivers" at:
> could you tell what's blocking DEP5 status from
> switching to ACCEPTED? Are there any more ongoing
> discussions on it?
Yes one question do I need to document aclocal.m4 copyright patchwork ?
> P.S: Hoping that Raphael wont mind too much that
> I'm a bit hijacking his thread! :)
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org
> Archive: 4F148BAB.email@example.com">http://lists.debian.org/4F148BAB.firstname.lastname@example.org