On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 22:11:35 +0000, Roger Leigh wrote: > There are 19 packages still using /dev/.udev after udev transitioned > to /run/udev. Unless there are any objections, I'd like to raise the > severity of these bugs from important to serious, given that the /run > migration is a release goal. > I object. If the packages are unusable as a result, these bugs are grave. If not, they're at most important. In any case "serious" is wrong. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature