Re: Bug#652275: Guided partitioning should not offer separate /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions; leave that to manual partitioning
Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> Lars Wirzenius, 2011-12-16 15:38+0100:
> > resize2fs, at least, only supports online resizing to make the filesystem
> > larger, not smaller. It's not particularly useful for, say, the root
> > filesystem.
>
> This is also true of Ext* with resize2fs, and probably most file
> systems. Online shrinking is a very rare feature.
Even when offline it is not univerial to have shrinking available.
For example xfs does not provide a way to shrink a filesystem either
online or offline. A sorely missed feature in an otherwise excellent
filesystem.
Bob
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Bug#652275: Guided partitioning should not offer separate /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions; leave that to manual partitioning
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
- Re: Bug#652275: Guided partitioning should not offer separate /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions; leave that to manual partitioning
- From: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
- Re: Bug#652275: Guided partitioning should not offer separate /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions; leave that to manual partitioning
- From: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#652275: Guided partitioning should not offer separate /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions; leave that to manual partitioning
- From: Stig Sandbeck Mathisen <ssm@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#652275: Guided partitioning should not offer separate /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions; leave that to manual partitioning
- From: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi>
- Re: Bug#652275: Guided partitioning should not offer separate /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions; leave that to manual partitioning
- From: Tanguy Ortolo <tanguy@ortolo.eu>