[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Fwd: [ISC-Bugs #25979] What happened to the dhcp patch in ISC-Bugs #24697 (Debian Bug #616290)?]



On Dec 16, Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:

> Indeed so.  But if upstream won't take the memory allocation patch
> then a "big enough" #define is surely better than not having a dhcp
> client.
If Hurd developers would suddenly start to act pragmatically, then
they may suddenly question what they are doing with their life. :-)

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: