On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 09:40:47AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le samedi 22 octobre 2011 à 16:24 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit : > > > One point to think of is how this works with multiarch, which is > > > being introduced > > > in Debian. Instead of 'ifort' should we use the architecture triplet, eg. > > > i386-linux-intel instead ? > > > Then the libraries go in i386-linux-intel rather than i386-linux-gnu > > > for gfortran; > > > ditto for the .mod files in /usr/include/i386-linux-intel > > I'm not familiar with this i386-linux-intel triplet. Is this a triplet > > targeted by the toolchain? Does software built for this target not use GNU > > libc? (I guess I can't presume that it uses any libc at all, since we're > > speaking specifically of fortran here.) > It uses the same libc, but it uses a different Fortran library. > Because of that library, you can link Fortran libraries and programs > only against other Fortran libraries built with the same compiler. The > architecture triplet would be the same, but it would need an addition > for the Fortran library. Ok; it doesn't sound like multiarch is a good fit for this then, unfortunately. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature