Re: aptitude weirdness wrt upgrades and keeps

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, aptitude@packages.debian.org
Subject: Re: aptitude weirdness wrt upgrades and keeps
From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:41:30 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] CAKTje6Gf64PPFgxbXPhbgKTQiQ3_K8D50embvvQFRBXXU4h60A@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20111014053536.GG10244@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
References: <[🔎] 20111014040005.GB10244@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <[🔎] CAKTje6EkGZ0UT7+v5mgyWYjOVJAVJfifV+1H498DGJMCQwTnDg@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20111014053536.GG10244@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>

On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:

> Not a solution for the interactive mode, or am I wrong?

Not AFAICT, I only read the documentation rather than the code though.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: aptitude weirdness wrt upgrades and keeps
  - From: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>

References:
- aptitude weirdness wrt upgrades and keeps
  - From: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
- Re: aptitude weirdness wrt upgrades and keeps
  - From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
- Re: aptitude weirdness wrt upgrades and keeps
  - From: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>

Prev by Date: Re: aptitude weirdness wrt upgrades and keeps
Next by Date: Re: Re: RFC: Making mail-transport-agent Priority: optional
Previous by thread: Re: aptitude weirdness wrt upgrades and keeps
Next by thread: Re: aptitude weirdness wrt upgrades and keeps
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread