Re: New package doesn't fix the problem in the old version
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 18:40:10 +0100, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 06:09:18PM BST, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > my opinion..
> > * unstable and *testing* users are supposed to be able to cope with
> > the one or other glitch, if they don't, they use stable.
> I know that, thank you. I've been doing that for nearly a decade.
> > * this is a colossal waste of time.
> That might be true.
> All I was trying to do was to establish was whether you're being
> lazy/unhelpful or is there a policy which I've missed as, per my earlier
> email, I can't remember last time I filed a bug which later version
> hadn't corrected, no matter how trivial it was.
Looks like it's the former.