Re: A short question about apt-get build-dep

To: svante.signell@telia.com
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: A short question about apt-get build-dep
From: YunQiang Su <wzssyqa@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:27:35 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] CAKcpw6XCuzQqMAmrUD3r4JyXK=82m13Tmz1nf-4HYD_OCOKF-g@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1313744824.23232.60.camel@hp.my.own.domain>
References: <[🔎] 1313744824.23232.60.camel@hp.my.own.domain>

> Does changing the order prefer openjade before openjade1.3? Or would
> adding openjade1.3 [!hurd-i386] be a better solution.
>
I believe that changing the order is better.

-- 
YunQiang Su

Reply to:

References:
- A short question about apt-get build-dep
  - From: Svante Signell <svante.signell@telia.com>

Prev by Date: A short question about apt-get build-dep
Next by Date: Re: A short question about apt-get build-dep
Previous by thread: A short question about apt-get build-dep
Next by thread: Re: A short question about apt-get build-dep
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread