[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Alioth status update, take 3



On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 04:39:06PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2011 00:03:13 +0200 Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
> 
> > If you have a specific example of something that does not work, it can
> > be fixed.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks Alioth maintainers for all the hard work you did for the migration.
> As happens after every migration, some things may still be left. So, I am
> adding more possible stuff to the TODO list. Some issues I still see 
> pending:

Besides the problems I pointed out in my last mail, seems to be some
confusion for personal git repos. I see they were duplicated during 
migration between wagner and vasks. Where should they really live?

There also is some confusion in its current handling since some of the
redirections seem to point to wagner and some to vasks, so I am afraid
currently some people is committing to wagner and some people is committing
to vasks.

To make things more funny some of the addresses result in pointing to vasks
or wagner, not to a single destination.

For instance, http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/ will show package status in
vasks, e.g.,

users/philipp/bayesian-toolbox 	Bayes Toolbox Philipp Benner   24 hours ago

but looking inside that repo, last change shown is that of wagner,

heads: 8 days ago master

For some projects recently added to vasks, a project unknown error is given
(I had it for super-pt, not really a package, just a failed test about how 
gitweb displays a submodules super-repo) which was displayed at
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/, but failed to open until I also put it in
wagner.

I even had a problem with one of my experimental repos which ended up
pushing to one box and pulling from the other.

Thanks in advance for handling the transition and dealing with all these
problems.

Regards,

-- 
Agustin


Reply to: