Re: packaging-dev meta package
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Benjamin Drung <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Do you like the idea or not?
> Do you have a better name for the meta package?
How about build-something (keeping with the build-essential naming)?
> Should something added to or removed from the dependency list?
the various vcs-buildpackage scripts
signing-party (for caff)
<more static analysis tools>
Please make most of the dependencies recommends so that people can
easily pick and choose what they want installed.