Re: [RFC] Changing APT to pre-depend on ${shlibs:Depends}

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: deity@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Changing APT to pre-depend on ${shlibs:Depends}
From: "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <jackyf@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 19:15:38 +0300
Message-id: <[🔎] 20110520161538.GA6888@r500-debian>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, deity@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1305892689.27909.14.camel@jak-thinkpad>
References: <1303908808.11353.6.camel@jak-thinkpad> <20110427163435.GA17477@r500-debian> <1303926882.18323.7.camel@jak-thinkpad> <[🔎] 19925.3314.134049.657491@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <[🔎] 1305892689.27909.14.camel@jak-thinkpad>

On 2011-05-20 13:58, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Eugene thinks it is unfair if APT were to pre-depend on things while
> Cupt would not [...]

No, I didn't say that. I did say it is possible to upgrade a Debian
system without APT, and you cannot attribute anything beyond this to
me.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer

Reply to:

References:
- Re: [RFC] Changing APT to pre-depend on ${shlibs:Depends}
  - From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: [RFC] Changing APT to pre-depend on ${shlibs:Depends}
  - From: Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Sponsorship in Debian (Re: Ubuntu-originated packages in Debian (Re: ubuntu keyring?))
Next by Date: Re: Using -Werror in CFLAGS for a debian package build
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] Changing APT to pre-depend on ${shlibs:Depends}
Next by thread: Re: [RFC] Changing APT to pre-depend on ${shlibs:Depends}
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread