Re: Best practice for cleaning autotools-generated files?
* Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> schrieb:
> >> The problem is that autoreconf offers NO command line options for you to
> >> pass the required -I parameters for aclocal, nor is there a way to encode
> >> that information in the one place where it could conveniently live
> >> (configure.ac) AFAIK.
> >
> > So, more precisely: autoreconf lacks an important feature would like
> > to see.
>
> I don't think this is the case -- others have already explained how to
> achieve the goals above. If you still believe something is missing in
> autoreconf, please report it to upstream so it can be fixed.
I was just summing up what I learned from this thread for now.
Let's repeat this: (correnct me if I'm wrong)
Autoconf (w/o automake) offers no means to tell additional m4
include pathes (eg. in configure.ac), so that just calling
autoreconf (w/o any additional parameters!) can do a full
regeneration all on its own.
Right ?
cu
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/
phone: +49 36207 519931 email: weigelt@metux.de
mobile: +49 151 27565287 icq: 210169427 skype: nekrad666
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: