Re: Best practice for cleaning autotools-generated files?
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Best practice for cleaning autotools-generated files?
- From: Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@metux.de>
- Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 14:50:17 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20110507125017.GD25423@nibiru.local>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Reply-to: weigelt@metux.de
- In-reply-to: <20110317130818.GA1724@khazad-dum.debian.net>
- References: <20110315222957.GA5440@beczulka> <20110315225554.ec88ad84.codehelp@debian.org> <20110315233559.GC2356@decadent.org.uk> <20110316092035.249c8cf7.codehelp@debian.org> <20110316193506.GF7918@khazad-dum.debian.net> <AANLkTi=pd6spiKn41GjL5p7xMhEdQWSxDu1QgAh9CBc+@mail.gmail.com> <20110317130818.GA1724@khazad-dum.debian.net>
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> schrieb:
> Yes. I think it was Cyrus IMAP that required -I in places where
> autoreconf doesn't reach, so I called each tool separately. Which is
> obviously a problem in autoreconf.
Is it really a problem of autoreconf ?
Imagine the following situation:
I'm (as upstream) using serval macros in their own .m4 files (eg.
in ./m4/, maybe even sorted into subdirs). Can autoreconf figure
out the required search pathes all on its own ?
cu
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/
phone: +49 36207 519931 email: weigelt@metux.de
mobile: +49 151 27565287 icq: 210169427 skype: nekrad666
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: