[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: this list archive spoils e-mails + strange Enigmail typos



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2011-05-06 18:52, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
> On 2011-05-06 12:18, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
>> Heh, that's what this question is about. :-)
>>
>> Restricting certain privileges (like su root) to certain users only
>> looks more secure than letting everyone do it... Is there any particular
>> reason Debian GNU/Linux is so permissive by default?
>>
>> --=20
>> Eisenbits - proven software solutions: http://www.eisenbits.com/
>> OpenPGP: E3D9 C030 88F5 D254 434C  6683 17DD 22A0 8A3B 5CC0
> 
> This e-mail has quoted Henrique's text (check the message source!), but
> here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/05/msg00369.html it is
> cut out. It also doesn't display in my Icedove 2.0.0.24.
> 
> I also have no idea where did those "=20" (there are 2) come from. I was
> typing gnupg private key password to sign the message (with Enigmail
> OpenPGP 0.95.0), but typed it incorrectly at the first time.
> 
> What is it??
> 
> It is also the first time that I noticed that people's e-mail addresses
> are just plain mailto:s on the archive page...
> 

Hi

I had a similar problem once and it was caused by mistyping the password
in enigmail once.  As I recall it would kill the first part of email
(usually the first quoted part, but not always) and cause those =20
encodings.
  As I recall it was fixed around the time enigmail was upgraded to work
with icedove 3.0 (so around version 2:1.0.1-1).

~Niels

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=DWFg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: