Re: A concrete proposal for rolling implementation
Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Josselin Mouette, 2011-05-04]
>> This would be a pseudo-suite, like experimental. Except that while
>> experimental is built on top of unstable and filled manually by
>> maintainers, rolling would be built on top of testing and filled
>> semi-automatically. A rolling system would have typically 2 APT lines:
>> one for testing and one for rolling.
>
> +1
>
> [...]
>> What to do during freezes
>> -------------------------
>> I’m not sure we really need to do something different in times of
>> freeze. Our time would be better spent by reducing the freeze time and
>> making it more predictable; squeeze has been an awesome step in this
>> direction.
>
> I'm not interested in helping f.e. with Perl bugs so once the ones
> I care about are fixed, I just want to focus on Sid (i.e. upload new
> upstream versions, prepare new transitions etc.) - I can wait a month or
> two, but these long freezes demotivate me a lot.
While I agree with the demotivation stance, why can't those packages be
uploaded to experimental, fwiw ?
Reply to: