Re: Bits from the Release Team - Kicking off Wheezy
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bits from the Release Team - Kicking off Wheezy
- From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 21:24:11 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87liyrrqtw.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
- In-reply-to: <20110430233219.GA14045@madism.org> (Pierre Habouzit's message of "Sun, 1 May 2011 01:32:19 +0200")
- References: <20110428205949.GB8870@rivendell.home.ouaza.com> <87fwp0grbb.fsf@solon.marcbrockschmidt.de> <20110430074538.GF19536@rivendell.home.ouaza.com> <8762pwgkb2.fsf@solon.marcbrockschmidt.de> <20110430102806.GA16642@upsilon.cc> <20110430233219.GA14045@madism.org>
Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@madism.org> writes:
> No what we want is probably to be attractive to developers, while
> keeping our standards about the stable release, which is what really
> matters. And to do that, well, what we need is to make working for
> Debian easier. Not harder. rolling is making working for Debian harder,
> hence is a bad proposal. Harder because it means people will have more
> work for a package. Maintainers are (me included) often too lazy to
> prepare Stable updates because it's a PITA to have to work on a 1-yo
> version of the package. Why would they be more motivated to work on
> testing packages?
> No we should focus instead on making packaging easier, not adding new
> constraints, new goals. Here are a few thoughts on how to do that.
[...]
I don't think I'm convinced that rolling would make anything harder, and I
don't want to support that part of Pierre's message, but I did want to say
that the description laid out in this message about how PPAs could work
and on using a unified VCS for that purpose sounds *awesome*, and I would
love to use something like that.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: