On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:14:12PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Luk Claes <luk@debian.org> (04/04/2011): > > The most obvious reason to not degrade bash to Priority: important > > is obviously that one needs to declare a dependency on bash when > > it's used in a package. Which means quite some packages will need to > > be changed. > What is the most obvious reason to degrade bash to Priority: important? > (I can understand shell maintainers would like to get bash out of > their way, but how many (other) people really want to get rid of it?) Anybody doing development for embedded systems. :) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature