Re: Bits from the Release Team - Kicking off Wheezy
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
 
- Subject: Re: Bits from the Release Team - Kicking off Wheezy
 
- From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
 
- Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2011 01:59:02 +0530
 
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1301776144.9908.29.camel@pi0307572>
 
- In-reply-to: <4D942C4F.9020009@free.fr>
 
- References: <20110329095102.GX37987@feta.halon.org.uk>		 <4D936684.2050408@debian.org> <20110330181952.GA27638@bongo.bofh.it>		 <20110330195016.GV2356@decadent.org.uk>		 <20110330220125.GA29348@bongo.bofh.it>	 <1301523923.10056.98.camel@localhost> <4D942C4F.9020009@free.fr>
 
Le jeudi 31 mars 2011 à 09:25 +0200, Vincent Danjean a écrit : 
> Martin F. Krafft started to implement a replacement of ifupdown that
> is better designed. But, due to lack of manpower I think, this project
> did not finish. See this archives of netconf-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
> for more info.
I wonder what amount of features we are missing for network-manager to
do the job; instead of rewriting a daemon from scratch, we might as well
use one that was designed mostly for the same purpose. It’s
event-driven, it’s extensible, and its features list is already
impressive. Although it has some bugs remaining to fix, this would also
be the case of the new implementation.
The primary drawback I see is that some people object to having D-Bus
installed on their systems. But should we manage to get NM being the
default, we could keep ifupdown in the archive to manage trivial setups
with less disk/memory usage; just as an optional replacement.
-- 
 .''`.
: :' :     “You would need to ask a lawyer if you don't know
`. `'       that a handshake of course makes a valid contract.”
  `-        --  J???rg Schilling
Reply to: