On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 05:39:13PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > ]] Julien Cristau > > | On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 16:20:10 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > | > | > Given that Fedora are adopting /run, and it has been something > | > we have wanted in the past, is anyone working on implementing > | > /run in Debian? > | > > | > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/146976 > > Incidentially, I just sent a mail proposing this as a release goal. > > | That seems to say "on Debian /lib/init/rw was introduced for the same > | thing, but I'm using a different name just because I can". What am I > | missing? > > It's a bit of an abuse of the /lib namespace. It also outlines a plan > for how to get rid of /var/run and /var/lock long-term, something I > don't believe /lib/init/rw ever tried to. It was just somewhere to > stuff random early data. Exactly. It also provides a place for people currently abusing the /dev tmpfs, and using /etc as a writable location for cache files (LVM2). % ls -1d /dev/.* /dev/.initramfs /dev/.initramfs-tools /dev/.mdadm /dev/.udev Once present, it should be easy to provide compatibility symlinks for /lib/init/rw, /var/run and /var/lock. Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/ `- GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature