Re: [buildd-tools-devel] new buildd dependency resolution breaks self depends?
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 07:59:12PM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
> It's all one source package. I split it up the binaries because:
> 1) about 60% of the package could be in an 'all' package.
> 2) the runtime components for different architectures can be installed
> side-by-side... thus enabling cross-compilation.
Oh OK, so there is no build dependancy issue at all then (since no one
would be dumb enough to make a package that build depends on one of its
own binaries, would they?).
> According to Kurt, there is no problem. It's all in my head. :)