Re: Cross compiler ITP (armel)
>> The current design is the Binary packages can contain an additional
>> control field: Built-Using.
> First of all, thanks very much for taking care of it, that probably
> will get us going.
> I just would like to point out that current design solves half of
> the problem (being GPL compliant),
No, it solves all of the problem, cos ....
> but it does not solve code duplication in the archive,
this is a different thing entirely. B-U is solely mean of ensuring
to do what the licenses want us to do. Getting sanity into packages
providing source around and duplication is different to that.
[Talking about Social Contract]:
We will not discriminate noone[...]
[So we discriminate anyone?]