Re: Cross compiler ITP (armel)
On 22.03.2011 14:20, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2011-03-22, Matthias Klose <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> The current design is the Binary packages can contain an additional
>>> control field: Built-Using.
>> that would be too strict for e.g. gcj-4.5
>> Built-Using: gcc-4.5 (>= 4.5.2-1~), gcc-4.5 (<< 4.5.3)
>> would be correct, however this already can be expressed in the build
>> dependencies, so I assume packages like gcj-4.x, gdc-4.x, gnat-4.x don't need to
>> be changed.
> They'd need to *generate* them in the *binary* packages. So you "just" declare
> the one that was installed at the time of building and you're set.
no, they are not needed at all for these packages.