Hi! On Wednesday 02 March 2011 03.38:42 Ron Johnson wrote: > On 03/01/2011 06:19 AM, ximalaya wrote: > > Hi all, > > [snip] > > > BTW, I ever tried on Redhat Linux 9, no such problem. > > This is the interesting part. Is RH keeping their patches, or are > upstream and other distros just not determining them worthwhile? Or is it an eglibc <> libc issue? (Not sure what libc RH is using.) -- vbi -- Vertrauen ist gut. Anwalt ist saugeil.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.