Re: package testing, autopkgtest, and all that
Iustin Pop writes ("Re: package testing, autopkgtest, and all that"):
> As it seems to me, right now this is most useful for individual
> maintainers to declare, and run, their own tests to ensure the built
> packages are fine. A good start, I'd say.
Yes, you can certainly use it that way.
> I think even without a full archive integration, having this spec
> publicised a bit among developers would be useful; I know I'm looking
> forward to adapting my own packages.
Perhaps I should be trying to get the spec referred to in useful
places ?
Ian.
Reply to: