On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 03:53:14PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote: > > Expected: > > 'Format','Upstream-Name','Upstream-Contact','Source','Disclaimer','Comment > > ','Copyright','Files','License','Format-Specification','Name','Maintainer', > > 'Upstream-Maintainer','Upstream-Source' or an acceptable parameter matching > > 'X-.*' > > So it seems that the CeCILLv2 licence (sort of french GPL licence) [1] is > > unknown of your software:) Add thoses licences to the licences keys whould > > be a good things ?. At the end how many licences keys ? > DEP5 model knows the list of keywords specified in DEP5 [1], which are the most > commonly used. There's currently a long thread in debian-project list about > managing the license keywords. > In your case, either this keyword must be added to the list in > DEP5 or you can choose to ignore the warning. Please make your model recognize when a stand-alone license stanza is present which defines a new license name in the file. DEP5 is *not* intended to have an authoritative list of all licenses in use, only the common ones; still, we *do* need validating parsers to recognize when there's an undefined reference to a license name that's not defined in the file. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature