[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#605892: please state that mails will be publically archived



Hi,

basically Stefano already described in his previous mail (not the one I'm 
replying to now) what I think is sensible for reportbug: display just a short 
note, nothing scary, nothing to accept. You accept by using reportbug, just 
like it always has been.

On Montag, 6. Dezember 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Maybe it's just me, but TBH *that* would be an overreaction :) Also, I
> believe it would be quite scary, as every time a user has to explicitly
> _accept_ something, she will fill awkward somehow.

+1

> Let's remember that we are not doing anything wrong with user data,
> privacy or the like. We just happen to be a fully open project, which is
> committed not to hide bug reports. So yes, we _can_ do something like
> you propose, but I personally don't see the need for that.

+1

> I don't see it as terribly urgent, but this should probably better be
> checked with the release team. It looks like quite hard to have it into
> Squeeze if you want to add a new explicit interaction. OTOH, if it can
> be fixed by simply changing a string which is already there, it might be
> easier to have it in. Unfortunately, it will require translations
> though...

Yes, I dont think it needs to be pushed in Squeeze.


cheers,
	Holger

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: