On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 12:26 +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: > Moreover, it'd be consistent with having chmod and chown in /bin. btw: Consistency was the main reason for me to raise the question whether other acl tools (nfs4) should be moved, too then. But Maximiliano is right,... I also do not see any current usecase for nfs acls during boot. Cheers, Chris.
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature