Re: Priority dependence
"brian m. carlson" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> The vi and nano debate was had a long time ago. So was the nvi versus
> vim-tiny. It was decided that first-time users were not going to be
> able to navigate vi, but experienced users would expect it. I don't
> know why people argued for vim-tiny over nvi; for a really rudimentary
> base system, I think smaller is better.
There was a long argument at the time which mostly amounted to, if I
remember correctly, vim having a more active upstream.
Russ Allbery (email@example.com) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>