Re: Parallellizing the boot in Debian Squeeze - ready for wider testing
On Fri, 7 May 2010 19:27:54 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli
>On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 06:15:24PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
>> On Fri, 7 May 2010 09:26:18 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli <email@example.com> wrote:
>> >The init.d world has changed quite a bit in recent years and might
>> >change even more in the next, it is possible that for Squeeze+1 we'll
>> >want to be elsewhere than at CONCURRENCY=makefile.
>> If we want to be elsewhere for squeeze+1, why do we need to do a
>> critical migration twice?
>(Beside the nitpick on "we want" vs "we possibly want") I'd argue that
>it's because we want a faster boot from our users ASAP.
So it is the classical desktop vs. server situation. For my Debian
servers, that get booted at most once a month, I don't give a damn
about a faster boot.
I _do_ care, however, about not having migrations in the boot process
which has the potential of breaking a system reboot, possibly making
it necessary to obtain a means to access the console in case of
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834