[OT] Re: Binary package names for mozilla plugins [Was: Bits from the Mozilla Extension Packaging Team]

To: Benjamin Drung <bdrung@ubuntu.com>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: [OT] Re: Binary package names for mozilla plugins [Was: Bits from the Mozilla Extension Packaging Team]
From: Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:02:03 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 20100427010203.GC14261@kunpuu.plessy.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1272307241.4479.24.camel@deep-thought>
References: <[🔎] 1272307241.4479.24.camel@deep-thought>

Le Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 08:40:41PM +0200, Benjamin Drung a écrit :
> 
> I setup a doodle poll

Dear Benjamin,

I would like to recommend http://selectricity.org/ instead. In contrary to
Doodle, Selectricity is free software.

Cheers,

-- 
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OT] Re: Binary package names for mozilla plugins [Was: Bits from the Mozilla Extension Packaging Team]
  - From: Benjamin Drung <bdrung@ubuntu.com>

References:
- Re: Binary package names for mozilla plugins [Was: Bits from the Mozilla Extension Packaging Team]
  - From: Benjamin Drung <bdrung@ubuntu.com>

Prev by Date: Re: bindv6only again
Next by Date: Re: bindv6only again
Previous by thread: Re: Binary package names for mozilla plugins [Was: Bits from the Mozilla Extension Packaging Team]
Next by thread: Re: [OT] Re: Binary package names for mozilla plugins [Was: Bits from the Mozilla Extension Packaging Team]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread