Re: bindv6only again
On Monday 26 April 2010 20:22:07 Don Armstrong wrote:
> There's no conflict here. The definition quoted says nothing about
> default meaning "only permittable", exactly as Matthew claims above.
>
> If the software doesn't work properly when either of the permissible
> values is set when it is possible for the software to handle either
> value correctly, the software is buggy. It may not be a bug that you
> rush to fix, but it certainly is one.
Set by whom? If the program itself doesn't change the setting, it will not
expect it to be another one.
There is a conflict, just pretending there isn't, doesn't make it go away.
Bye
--
Salvo Tomaselli
Reply to: