Re: About new source formats for packages without patches
Sven Mueller <email@example.com> writes:
> Wouter Verhelst schrieb:
>> Of course, this all conveniently ignores the fact that the above
>> explicit non-native option isn't actually supported, which is
> Didn't check for this: Is a bug open to request such a feature to
> explicitly say "1.0 (native)" or "1.0 (non-native)"? I would also find
> this option really useful
There's really no meaningful difference between a hypothetical 1.0
(native) and the already-implemented 3.0 (native), so you can just use 3.0
(native) for that.
That doesn't solve the 1.0 (non-native) request, though, and I suspect
that's the more common case.
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>