OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du mardi 09 mars 2010, vers 01:14, Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> disait : >>> Maybe the group of people doing that work should also be the people who >>> decide when Python 2.6 will be uploaded, if the current maintainer >>> isn't able or willing to coordinate the work for whatever reason? >> Yes, that would be awesome in theory, still quite difficult (or seen as >> rude) in reality. > Well, I'm personally not directly involved with Python development, but it > seems like a lot of people are upset with the way that the python package > is being maintained. We do have a procedure for this: it falls under the > jurisdiction of the Debian Technical Committee. If there is a group of > people who believe they would be better able to maintain the python > package than the current maintainer and are willing to assemble a team and > propose themselves as the maintainers, that's certainly something that can > be appealed to the Debian Technical Committee for discussion. Some respectable people keep telling us that the problem is handled and the solution will come soon. Going to the technical committee may be seen at confrontational against them, I think. -- MUD IS NOT ONE OF THE 4 FOOD GROUPS MUD IS NOT ONE OF THE 4 FOOD GROUPS MUD IS NOT ONE OF THE 4 FOOD GROUPS -+- Bart Simpson on chalkboard in episode 9F15
Attachment:
pgpVrPnYidR01.pgp
Description: PGP signature