On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 08:53 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > The primary one I'm unhappy with is its deleting part of the upstream > > tarball with (AFAIK) no warning and no control. (That is, if upstream > > have a debian dir, it gets nuked, rather than us collaborating on it). > > That's a feature and an advantage in many situations. It really doesn't > forbid you to reuse the upstream dir nor does it forbid you to collaborate > with upstream to update it. So how do you do that? -Rob
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part