Re: Possible DDPOMail improvements?
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 02:57:45PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 13/02/10 at 21:09 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 08:46:31PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > But we are constantly wondering where we should go from there. Should we
> > > add more data (like the RC bugs in stable and the unfixed security
> > > issues)? Or should we instead try to decrease the amount of data (to
> > > increase the signal/noise ratio), for example by not reporting about
> > > Lintian errors and warnings?
> >
> > One thing that would be nice, but that is not directly related to DDPO
> > messages or the PTS, though it's always when i receive the DDPO mail
> > that i think about it, would be to allow upstream version tracking of
> > branches.
> >
> > For example, right now, for iceweasel, version 3.6 is reported as the
> > last version, which is nice, but i'd also like to be able to get a
> > report when 3.5.8 is going to be released, though i'd also like to keep
> > the current tracking for the 3.6 versions.
>
> Isn't that just a problem of writing your debian/watch in a way that
> picks up 3.5.8 but not 3.6.X?
Partially, since DDPO won't then follow 3.6 as well.
Mike
Reply to: