Re: Should ucf be of priority required?
On Sat, Dec 05 2009, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 06:37:45PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> It is the package's responsibility to remove those files, "ucf --purge"
>> does not do that, see ucf(1).
> I never said that. The problem are not the files owned by the package,
> but the files owned by ucf, which are modified by ucfr, while not
> restoring the changes if ucf is not around.
Well, if ucf is not around, one should not expect the internal
state of ucf to be up to date. Is this a problem?
"You can't make a program without broken egos."
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C