[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Explicitely Cc bug reporters



Le jeudi 10 septembre 2009 à 15:43 +0100, Mark Brown a écrit : 
> What would be really useful here is the ability to set up the BTS to
> subscribe you to bugs you've filed by default.  That avoids the issue
> with confusing less technical users.

No, it wouldn’t be useful.

Not all reports are well-written and contain a clear enough explanation
for the issue. When they are, there’s rarely a need for discussion
anyway. Most reports are useless junk explaining “It doesn’t work”, or
simply lack sufficient information to understand the affected component.

90% of emails I write to a bug are meant for the submitter. I should not
have to Cc him. Ever. This is the whole point of a bug tracking system.
Debbugs is, AFAIK, the only one to require that.

-- 
 .''`.      Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `'   “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in
  `-     future understand things”  -- Jörg Schilling

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=


Reply to: